If chance in its many expressions started and guided the formation of all that we see today - from binary star systems to obligate symbionts - then the universe would indeed contain no true thought or reason. We could subjectively assign appearances of thought or reason, but would have to concede that things can simply make themselves and guide their own development by surfing the algorithms of blind chance.
Did you get that? We use our thoughts and reasoning to say that no thought or reason went into the universe! People come up with intellectually neotanised theories like Darwinism through their ability to think and reason - albeit through a convoluted mess of contradiction and logical fallacies. The very autonomous abilities of our mind show that indeed thought and reason exists in the universe, and to get that you need a transcendent expresser; someone had to inject our consciousness into creation.
I don't know how much longer Darwinites and Dawkinsites can go on telling us why they think everything evolved, while neglecting to tell us the nuts and bolts of how it evolved. To do that you have to by-pass logic and the empiricism of mathematics and delve into the realms of mathematical impossibility and logical fallacies. As David Berlinski put it, there is a definite slide down the scale of intelligibility from mathematics, to mathematical physics, to evolutionary biology. If only people would think about why they can think...
Further reading: www.drdino.com, www.creationtoday.org, www.icr.org, www.answersingenesis.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment